|
Volume 11: Issue 4-October 2008
(ABSTRACTS)
ARTICLES
“Religious Education and Information Technology: Challenges and Problems”
Seyed Sajjadi, Tarbiat Modares University
Read Full Text
(subscription restrictions may apply.)
With advances in information technology, the velocity of information production on the global level has expanded as well. This acceleration has lead to the delegitimizing of knowledge, the equating of information with knowledge and the giving of predominance to information rather than knowledge. This advance has created epistemological challenges for the process of religious education. At the same time, the growth of the internet has created a “rhizomatic space” possessing new methodological characteristics that create problems for religious education. Information technology generates a “hyper-textual learning space,” which weakens the place of traditional texts in the learning process, particularly in the traditional processes of religious education process. This hyper-textual development is especially problematic for religious education in conservative or fundamentalist traditions. This article analyzes the epistemological, methodological and contextual problems and challenges posed by information technology for traditional religious education processes.
“The Ethics of Effective Teaching : Challenges from the Religious Right and Critical Pedagogy”
Marit Trelstad, Pacific Lutheran University
Read Full Text
(subscription restrictions may apply.)
Self-identified conservative students’ critiques of religious studies courses can sharpen our commitment to become more trustworthy educators who examine our craft of teaching honestly and thoroughly. Recognizing the high personal stakes students have when studying religion, we cannot dismiss those who critique the method and content of our courses as trivial or simply the mark of ignorance. Critical pedagogies, including feminist, postcolonial and postmodern forms, provide tools for assessing the adequacy of our responses to conservative and other minoritized voices in religious studies classrooms. Through them, we can come to honor the hesitancy or anger of our self-identified conservative students as insightful and informative for our own development as critical thinkers and educators.
“Teaching Religious Doubt with Toulmin’s Model of Reasoning”
Milton Horne, William Jewell College
Read Full Text
(subscription restrictions may apply.)
Teaching students to doubt, that is to “test,” theological arguments as one might test any other kind of knowledge is challenging in that the warrant for such testing is not immediately clear. Stephen Toulmin’s, et. al. model of reasoning provides a conceptual framework that demonstrates the logical relationships between a claim, its grounds, warrants and backing for warrants. Against such a model, the instructor and students may study religious claims, both biblical and theological, with the aim of analyzing the ways such claims find support or a lack of support depending upon the particular ways that claims and evidence have competing warrants. Several pedagogical benefits ensue. First, students see that the validity for theological claims rests as much upon warrants as it does upon grounding. Second, searching for ancient warrants privileges historical-critical investigation. Third, competing warrants for contradictory theological claims summon pedagogical metaphors of process and development.
“Faith in the Classroom: The Perspective of a Pastor Called to College Teaching”
Thomas Martin, Susquehanna University
Read Full Text
(subscription restrictions may apply.)
Can one uphold a call from an ecclesiastical body while teaching in a college classroom? This paper will argue that the dual roles of pastor/professor can be integrated by the adoption of faith development as a learning goal. This goal seems to stand at odds with three important aspects of academic teaching: the demographic reality of religious pluralism, the ethical requirement to preserve student autonomy and the overarching goal of a university education to promote critical thinking. My argument will be that far from violating these three areas, faith development as a broad learning goal can actually provide a valuable deepening of pluralism, autonomy and critical thought in the educational experience of students. The method of exploration will be autobiographical. I will show how it is that in my dual roles as an ELCA pastor called to a faculty post I articulate and use faith development as an overarching learning goal in the context of: 1.) a theological pedagogy based on an inter-faith logos theology; 2.) a value-laden pedagogy vis-à-vis consumerist self-formation; and 3.) an adaptation of stages of faith development to the classroom.
“Murder, He Wrote: Introducing Christian Ethics through One Question in the Summa”
William George, Dominican University
Read Full Text
(subscription restrictions may apply.)
The topic of murder fascinates and haunts undergraduates just as it does our culture. But even as murder violently closes doors on a human life, as a topic of discussion it can also open minds, provoking, extending, and refining students’ questions about the moral life, theologically and religiously understood. The aim of this essay is to explain how the brief treatment of murder found in Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologica offers an extraordinary introduction to the entire field of Christian ethics. “Of Murder” (ST II-II 46) may be suited to courses in “theological,” “religious,” or “comparative” ethics as well.
“Role-Playing and Religion: Using Games to Educate Millennials”
Adam Porter, Illinois College
Read Full Text
(subscription restrictions may apply.)
I have been experimenting with using role-playing and games in my religion classes for several years and have found that students respond well to these pedagogical tools and methods. After reviewing my experiences, I explore the reasons for their positive response. I argue that role-playing games capitalize on our students’ educational expectations and fondness for game-play, by drawing them into exploring significant texts and ideas. Of particular interest for religion and theology professors, these sorts of games also encourage empathy towards other viewpoints.
|