|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Are there glaring typos, misspellings, ungrammatical sentences, etc.?
3. Is documentation given in correct MLA format?
4. Is it a book review of one of the books on the library reserve list
of "Sources on Interreligious Dialogue"?
5. Has it clearly identified the goals, objectives, or purposes of the
book and of the interreligious dialogue it represents? (Note: Any
such interreligious dialogue is an attempt at a meeting of minds and spirits
of different religious traditions. Does the paper recognize the nature
and significance of the book as a genuine dialogue?)
6. Has the paper clearly evaluated the book in light of the identified
goals and how well the attempted meeting of minds and spirits has taken
place?
7. Has it clearly evaluated the book in terms of how well the author/editor
of the book and the participants in the dialogue have been empathetically
objective?
8. Does the paper give clear evidence to support these evaluations,
by way of discussing specific representative parts of the book -- allowing
the reader to see the truth of the evaluative claims being made about the
book?
9. Is the paper consistent with (and take account of) relevant material
covered in class?
10. Any other comments or suggestions for improvement?
