Skip to main content

Resources

Difficult, but Fun: Reclaiming Joyful Formation in the Age of AI

I am writing this blog post with my 8-year-old daughter’s voice still ringing in my ears: “Yes—it’s difficult, but it’s fun.” As a student, she said it during a violin lesson after wrestling with a new bow technique. Anyone who has practiced an instrument may know the scene—scales repeated until fingers ache, a teacher correcting the same motion for the tenth time. We often tell our children (and our students as well), “Practice makes perfect,” but the road to perfection is slow, repetitive, and occasionally tedious.My daughter’s shy voice—“difficult, but fun”—captures what philosopher Alasdair MacIntyre calls an internal good: a genuine joy experienced only inside a repetitive practice. External goods certainly loom large in my daughter’s world—a coveted seat in the district orchestra, a résumé line that thrills her parents. For her, slow and repetitive practice is “difficult”: she may desire a “shortcut” to finish practice quickly and play with her friends. And yet, in the middle of that drudgery, she found a deeper joy: the quiet thrill of coaxing one clear note from stubborn strings. Here, (slow) formation, not (fast) efficiency aimed at external validation, is the point.Technologists assure us that artificial intelligence will free us from menial work so we can focus on more meaningful and creative work. When I asked ChatGPT about its educational role, it offered the usual optimism, focusing on efficiency:"AI can be a powerful tool to enhance human productivity and creativity. Rather than replacing us, it can augment our abilities, making work more fulfilling. In this way, AI doesn’t just make life easier—it helps us reimagine what work means and empowers us to spend more time on what truly matters."The pronoun us jumped out at me. AI speaks as though it already shares human aims. But does it grasp what makes learning formative rather than merely efficient?Let us picture a humanities classroom. Reading primary texts—Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, for instance—often feels like violin practice: dense, slow, and sometimes tedious. A student can now upload the text, prompt an AI for a synopsis, and receive an instant outline. Hours saved, concepts clarified, quiz scores boosted—external goods secured.Yet that shortcut bypasses the internal good of reading itself. Lingering over a paragraph is not wasted time; it is the learning. More importantly, as we read, the text also reads us: a paragraph questions an unspoken assumption, an unfamiliar idea enlarges imagination, a story strangely mirrors our own. None of that occurs when we outsource reading to the so-called “efficient” AI.When we reframe reading as a powerful practice of formation, tedium turns into joy. While we move through the words, we are simultaneously moved by them—seen, challenged, and reshaped by voices from centuries ago or a continent away. Out of that slow interaction emerges the joy of reading for its own sake. It becomes an interior reward that resists quick translation into productivity metrics.Such formation extends well beyond the classroom. Someone who once wrestled patiently with Aristotle may later join a neighborhood book club simply for the pleasure of shared discovery. The capacity to be transformed by texts—through a time-consuming, attention-demanding encounter—is a deeply human gift that no algorithm can replicate.On the other hand, from a social ethics perspective, I am concerned about the issue of accessibility to this formative dimension of education. As AI more embeds itself in education, the formative joys of slow learning might risk becoming a privilege. Students juggling multiple jobs or heavy caregiving duties are the ones who would be more tempted to outsource reading to generative AI tools. If engagement is priced in hours only the well-resourced can spare, we reinforce inequities that we, as educators, claim to resist.Although we continue to work on this challenge, it is crucial for us as educators to foreground formation—particularly communal formation—in our pedagogy. Yes, AI can be a powerful tool. And it can help students in many ways. For example, AI may serve as a tutor, offering personalized learning experiences. Nevertheless, we need to re-claim the distinct human gift in the slow, shared process of learning. It is the dimension of education that makes us who we are, as individuals and communities, and that AI simply cannot provide. Yes, it is difficult, but fun!

Crafting Fair Attendance Policies: Part Two

In my first blog on this topic I tackled the question of how to create attendance policies that are suitable for the class content and context. But all this focus on the students neglects one more important factor – what about an attendance policy for the instructor?This was not a major concern of mine when I began teaching, but in the years since, I have had children and communicable illnesses have become a substantially more regular part of my life. I also began my current role in Fall of 2019, just before the pandemic began, which changed much of our larger discourse about “pushing through” illnesses and being present no matter what. But the same issues arise for any instructor who discovers they have to cancel a class unexpectedly – anyone who needs to do more complicated travel to get to a conference than expected, who is invited for a guest lecture with limited lead time, who is on the job market and might get a coveted on-campus interview. How do we cancel classes well?Now that I have a preschooler and a kindergartener, I cannot get through a semester without a cancellation due to their illnesses (which invariably become my illnesses). This term, I finally wrote an attendance policy for myself that I included in my syllabi. Here are a few things I considered while creating my expectations:As with any job, advance notice is best. I have promised my students that I will let them know class is cancelled as soon as I possibly can – which sometimes means I need to make a decision the night before rather than the morning of. When in doubt, I err on the side of cancelling if I’m sick – nobody needs my lecture enough that it’s worth them getting ill.I will not require my students to do any “makeup” work that takes more time than a normal class would have; whenever possible, I will keep makeup assignments significantly shorter than class time. Piling on unexpected work just feels unfair to me, but this standard is also key since I may not have an alternative assignment available by their usual class time. I need to respect that the hours students carve out for my course might be all the time they have, and additional work may cost them time they have to allocate elsewhere. I can show respect for my students’ complex lives by keeping things concise.When alternate assignments are needed, I use methods that students are already familiar with so that they are not wasting time trying to explore a new technology when I want them to be focused on course content. If I don’t use discussion boards in a class, I don’t ask students to use a discussion board for a cancelled day. Typically, I record my classes and rely on the video to create a shortened lecture.Sometimes, just skipping the day is fine. This won’t be possible for all sorts of courses – when classes are composed so that prior concepts need to be fully understood before moving on, skipping may never be an option – but my own course design is more iterative and removing any one day isn’t going to collapse the structure. I always mourn when I have to pull out a day of content that I love, but sometimes it’s better for my students and myself to move on without stressing about covering every single idea and story that I hoped for.We don’t plan our syllabi with last-minute changes in mind, but having a few priorities when imagining cancellations – and taking a moment to craft your own instructor attendance policy – can save you time and headaches when things don’t go as planned.

Lakisha R. Lockhart, PhD is Associate Professor of Christian Education at Union Presbyterian Seminary. 

2025 Hybrid Teaching and Learning WorkshopEarly Career Religion Faculty Teaching UndergraduatesApplication Dates:Opens: August 1, 2024Deadline: October 1, 2024Schedule of SessionsMarch 5, 2025, 3–5:30 pm ETApril 2, 2025, 3–5:30 pm ETMay 7, 2025, 3–5:30 pm ETJune 9–13, 2025 in-person (Wabash Center, Crawfordsville, IN)July 2, 2025, 3–5:30 pm ETAugust 6, 2025, 3–5:30 pm ETSeptember 3, 2025, 3–5:30 pm ETOctober 1, 2025, 3–5:30 pm ETLeadership TeamCarolyn Medine, Ph.D, University of GeorgiaTat-siong Benny Liew, Ph.D., College of the Holy CrossParticipantsXenia Chan, Augustana UniversityDeAnna Daniels, University of ArizonaDorcas Dennis, University of North Carolina, WilmingtonTimothy Gutmann, University of Southern MississippiRaleigh Heth, Purdue UniversityDavid Justice, Baylor UniversityMinjung Noh, Lehigh UniversityLudwig Noya, Valparaiso UniversityKathryn Phillips, Defiance CollegeChanelle Robinson, College of the Holy CrossKelsey Spinnato, Texas Lutheran UniversityJoseph Stuart, Brigham Young UniversitySara Williams, Fairfield UniversityApplication ClosedWabash Center Staff Contact:Sarah Farmer, Ph.DAssociate DirectorWabash Center301 West Wabash Ave.Crawfordsville, IN 47933farmers@wabash.eduDescriptionThis hybrid workshop invites early career faculty in their first five years of full-time teaching, either on the tenure track or in a continuing term position (lecturer, instructor, teaching scholar, postdoctoral fellow) to join a community of peers who value being imaginatively and critically reflective and increasingly skilled teachers. The workshop will gather participants who demonstrate a commitment to joining a collaborative learning cohort for seven online sessions and an in-person, five-day, summer session at Wabash Center. Sessions will include small group and plenary discussions. For the in-person gathering, there will also be structured and unstructured social time, and time for personal and communal discovery, relaxation, exercise, meditation, restoration, and shared meals.We will grapple with such questions as:Who is the self who teaches? What is agency in the classroom and in career?What knowledge and guidance are required to accurately read institutional contexts, cultures, and politics?What are the advantages and challenges regarding difference (not only among students but also between instructor and students) that are present in the classroom?What kinds of self-care do we need to be, in an ongoing way, healthy, generative, and passionate teachers?Considering the seasons of a teaching career, what are some practices of good teaching and the good life that we should develop in the early years? How can we remain imaginative, creative, and, if it is important to us, spiritual in our teaching?What pedagogies might strengthen teaching in early career?What are the challenges for which a peer conversation might be beneficial?GoalsTo form a collaborative and cooperative cohort of teacher-scholars who, in a generative space, can reflect on craft of teaching and envision career development trajectoriesTo develop ourselves as critically reflective and imaginative teacher-scholarsTo understand our teaching lives in the context of our institutions and the changing landscape of higher educationTo reflect on practices that help teacher-scholars to flourish and to care for self, family, students, and communities to which we are committedEligibilityFull time tenure track and continuing term1–5 years of teaching experience in a full-time, tenure track or other continuing positionTeaching religion, religious studies, or theology in an accredited college or university in the United States, Puerto Rico, or CanadaDoctoral degree awarded by January 2025Institutional support and personal commitment to participate fully in all workshop sessionsTenure decision (if applicable) no earlier than January of 2026Application MaterialsApplication Contact Information formCover letter: An introductory letter that describes your teaching context and addresses why you want to be part of this collaborative community, including what you hope to gain from it and what you might contribute to it. (Up to 500 words)Brief essay: Describe a critical moment that pushed you to think more deeply about your teaching. What happened and how did you respond? (Up to 500 words)Academic CV (4-page limit)A letter of institutional support for your full participation in this workshop from your Department Chair, Academic Dean, Provost, Vice President, or President. Please have this recommendation uploaded directly to your application according to the online application instructions. HonorariumParticipants will receive an honorarium of $3,000 for full participation in the hybrid workshop.Read More about Payment of Participants Important InformationForeign National Information Form Policy on Participation 

Emotional Labor in Teaching

If I have learned anything in this life of teaching, it is this: the emotional labor of teaching is genuine. Routinely, class sessions left me exhausted. After most sessions I would need to sit in silence for an hour to regain my energies or have a meal to replenish my body. The depletion was never from a lecture, but from the intensity of conversation with students. The emotional labor of teaching occurs due to the full engagement of body, mind, spirit, guts, wit, intuition, intellect, and humor, all summoned in the teaching encounter.When we do our teaching work well, classroom conversation can be powerfully interactive—for students and for us. Teaching religion, in confessional or non-confessional institutions, can stir up cultural tensions, stretch personal beliefs, raise consciousness and reenforce ethical obligations. Classrooms where the pursuit of truth is passionate, enthusiastic and exciting can take an emotional toll on the teachers because of the emotional investment in the endeavor. Interactions with students are often fulfilling but never neutral. The intensity of the conversation when students are expressing curiosity, thinking deeply, connecting previously disconnected ideas, and experiencing new insights can tax our emotional reservoirs.Emotional labor in the classroom is not a flaw, nor a side effect. Teachers who extend themselves, make themselves available, and open their hearts to students must realize that emotional presence—from delight to disappointment—is part of the work of teaching. Regardless of the season in one’s career, navigating identity, belief, and culture without falling into advocacy or detachment is hard. Vulnerability can be costly.For those of us who must contend with the disrespect, disregard and indignity foisted upon us by students who judge us as inferior due to our gender, race, nationality, age, or physical ability, the emotional toll assumes the jagged dimensions of discrimination and injustice. Classroom spaces riddled with unfair bias can be debilitating.To further complicate the challenge, students’ habit of coaxing teachers into boundary-blurring or insisting upon role overload can be aggravating. As an African American woman, students would treat me like women in their families or in their churches. Too often I was relegated to the status of deaconess, mother of the church, pastor’s wife, auntie or favorite cousin. Students, because of their lack of familiarity with an African American woman as a professor, and to appease their nervousness, would think of me as their counselor, lover, therapist, or friend. Many students would signal that I was like a familiar TV character—Florence Johnston, Oprah Winfrey, Aunt Viv or Clair Huxtable. I refused this status. I rejected the blurring and projection of these roles. I was their teacher. Being a teacher is a status, role, and an obligation worthy of pursuit and needs no appendages, additions, or attachments.The emotional labor needs to be monitored, nurtured, and attended to. Over long periods of time, the labor can erode us. Burnout, disengagement, cynicism, ill-health, or depression must be avoided.  Here are some strategies I have learned over the many years.Practical StrategiesPractice Grounding Ritualsmeditate and pray before class to center myselfstart class with breathing or meditationPlan the emotional rhythm of the semesterplan for low intensity class sessions, e.g. a trip (on or off campus), showing a film, guest speaker, art activity, playing a gameplan for time during the semester for rest and reflectionParticipate in peer support groups or professional support sessionsroutinely talk with colleagues or friends throughout the semestercontract a therapist, spiritual director, cleric, or counselorBe aware of burnout symptomsknow the symptoms of depression, burnout, fatigue and monitorjournal concerning your emotional health as pertains to teachingBe mindful of your own humannessmake sure you do not teach while over-tired or sleep deprivedbe well hydrated and not hungry in the classroomdress in clothes that make you feel confident and that are comfortableWe must find ways to stay emotionally connected while attending to our own needs. The emotional strain of teaching is part of the job but does not have to be a detriment of the job.Reflection QuestionsWhat are the moments that renew you in teaching? How can you plan for those moments?How do you plan your sessions so there is a rhythm to the semester?What conversations or practices help you stay grounded?What habits, practices and behaviors help you sustain your truest self in the classroom?What toolkit can you build for your emotional health and wellbeing?

joy in apocalypse

* Karen Yourish, Annie Daniel, Saurabh Datar, Isaac White, and Lazaro Gamio, “These Words Are Disappearing in the New Trump Administration,” The New York Times, March 7, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/03/07/us/trump-federal-agencies-websites-words-dei.html.

Gathering Date July 20-27, 2024 Pratt House Martha's Vineyard Team Nancy Lynne Westfield, Wabash Center Participants Roger Nam, Candler School of Theology at Emory University Lisa Thompson, Vanderbilt Mark Hearn, Church Divinity School of the Pacific Honorarium and Fellowship Participants will receive an honorarium of $1500 for full participation in the Conversation. Read More about Payment of Participants Important Information Foreign National Information Form Policy on Participation

Building Better Futures in Theological and Religious Academies Rountable Important Dates Event: October 27-31, 2024 Gathering Location Yerba Buena Center for the Arts San Francisco, CA Leadership Team Lynne Westfield Director Wabash Center Sarah Farmer Associate Director Wabash Center Participants Rachelle Green, Fordham University Jorge Juan Rodriguez, Union Theological Seminary Shively Smith, Boston University Chelsea Yarborough, Association of Theological Schools Onaje Woodbine, American University Jennifer Harvey, Garrett-Evangelical Theological Seminary Bryson White, Santa Clara University Past Event For more information, please contact: Sarah Farmer Associate Director Wabash Center farmers@wabash.edu Description How do we replenish, nurture, cultivate and foster visioning for new futures in the religion and theological academy? This is a gathering of a small cohort of colleagues who teach religion and theology to engage and reflect upon our place in building better futures in the academy through attendance at SOCAP24 Global Conference. We believe that creating better futures for the religion and theological academy must include an expanded lens beyond the current landscape of theological education. Our hope is that SOCAP24 offers us a glimpse into a larger world for our work in religion and theology. SOCAP Global is the thought leadership platform for accelerating movement towards a more just and sustainable economy. As stated on their website, they convene a global ecosystem and marketplace – social entrepreneurs, investors, foundation and nonprofit leaders, government and policy leaders, creators, corporations, academics, and beyond—through live and digital experiences that educate, spur conversation, and inspire investment in positive impact. Each religious/theological scholars that is participating in this gathering already has an eye towards building more just futures. Our aim is to enhance that vision and dream of pathways forward where we can become better teachers and create healthier institutions. Goals Attend 2024 SOCAP Global Conference together. To explore and imagine alongside a cross-sector of diverse thought leaders about the possibilities for change-making in institutional contexts. To concern ourselves with common ground, good community, the beloved community, bridge building, partnerships, collaborations, and coalitions. To debrief our experiences after the SOCAP Global Conference in order to discern ways of incorporating learnings into our personal or professional teaching lives. To provide spaces for facilitated networking, open dialogue, and intimate conversations about just ways forward. Journey with other scholars of religion/theology towards strengthening the reservoir of belief in the possibility of creating better futures. To articulate and spark visions for new and renewed possibilities for religious and theological education. Preliminary Questions How do we replenish, nurture, cultivate and foster visioning for new futures in the religion and theological academy? Where is the place for social entrepreneurship and visionary leadership as we meet the challenges emerging within theological and religious education? What are our questions and discovery experiences for the affirmation of our lives, healing and moving forward in light of the ever-evolving milieu of theological and religious education alongside the pressing issues in society? What is at stake if we don’t embody better teaching lives, strategize for more equitable institutions, and build more just futures? What partnerships, allies, and co-conspirators might be needed to strategize and invest in this hoped for future?

The Power of Wonder

A former student recently got in touch with me to catch up after a few years of silence. He said I was one of the few people who made him feel truly seen, and that’s what he needed right now. As we chatted, he asked about my Jan term backpacking with students in an Arizona canyon. When I described it to him, he replied, “That should called ‘Being in Awe 101!’ Actually, I think all of your classes should be titled that.” I like it. Being in Awe 101.He picked up on a particular element of my pedagogy that is always a goal but is especially potent in my outdoor courses: wonder. We know that children are great at this. They wander around the world enthralled, wondering at everything. We know as teachers that if we can only get students to wonder about something, then they can learn – that they learn much better if they are curious than when we tell them that they have to memorize this thing they find boring. We know the power of wonder in a classroom.Taking my students outside facilitates more wonder among them than I can generate in the classroom. I hear the question: Does making my students sit in the garden outside the English department building really make them wonder better about the reasons for the Council of Nicaea? Well, yes. When my students sit outside for class, they are generally more open. They feel like they can breathe and even, often, like they’re getting away with something. I’ve said as much before. That sense of freedom and of getting something past the authorities helps them drop their guard, be less armored about what they think is being asked or required of them in class. That openness allows the material to get past the bouncer in their brains. That openness is space for wonder.Sometimes quail run through the outdoor classroom and disrupt us in a way that makes us all laugh but also takes us out of “I’m a student and have to learn this thing my professor is saying” mode. Sometimes their internal bouncer gets wondering about the butterfly that floats near them and then is willing to wonder about the conversation happening in their group work. Even just noticing the colors of the flowers in the garden or the smell of the mulch is enough to cause that disruption. And once they wonder about one thing, they’re in a posture of wonder. Then, perhaps, they wonder about the discussion we’re having about the reading.We know we can inculcate wonder under the fluorescent lights, too. We associate with the Wabash Center because we care about creative ways to induce wonder. I only suggest that taking students outside can be a shortcut. Unless it’s raining. A good hike in the rain on a lengthy backpacking trip can still invoke wonder with the right attitude, but I admit that taking a normal class out in the rain will be more distracting than wonder-ful. Sometime I’ll tell you about the time I lost an entire class because the first day of rain that semester was in November and they didn’t know where our classroom was. Even that was the kind of disruption that calmed the internal bouncers.At one Wabash cohort workshop in Crawfordsville, I was excited that canoeing was an afternoon option because canoeing is maybe my favorite thing in the world. One of my cohort colleagues and I ended up in a canoe together. We had a lovely conversation at one point along the river about being awake to God. About that time a bald eagle soared overhead. We wondered together awhile. I watched my colleague – already a joyful, brilliant, fully alive person – become even more alive in her wonder. Months later she told me how she carried that moment of wonder back to her family and her world and the effects it had.The wilderness surprises us. It disrupts our “normal” with its “normal.” We are less able to pretend we’re in control when this happens, and I think this is why it is a place ripe for wonder. Our eyes are more open. They have to be, or we’ll miss the surprise. Or we’ll be surprised by something that feels more like an attack. We keep our eyes open outside and look closely at what’s around us. We see more clearly. This is the wonder.I suggest that as important as wonder is for learning, wonder is more important for being a decent human being among other human beings. It’s not enough to wonder in order to learn; we must also wonder about others in order to see one another clearly, in order to delight in one another. Wonder is the posture we need for awe to take root, and also delight. As we take our students outside to facilitate their wonder, they are practicing for more than the exam. We give them an experience of seeing deeply and of being deeply seen, and the wonder that produces will generate even more wonder. Perhaps then we’ll stand a chance in this world of wonders.

Angela D. Sims, PhD is President of Colgate Rochester Crozer Divinity School.

Adjudicating

Wabash Center Staff Contact

Sarah Farmer, Ph.D
Associate Director
Wabash Center

farmers@wabash.edu